Google didn’t investigate leaks that revealed Dragonfly, exec misconduct, more
Over the previous two years, Google has been rocked by a lot of leaks that exposed plans to re-enter China and govt payout particulars referring to sexual misconduct. Regardless of the high-profile and embarrassing nature of those incidents, worker depositions reveal that Google didn’t examine the leaks.
Wired at the moment reported on depositions of two Googlers associated to a lawsuit filed over the corporate’s restrictive confidentiality insurance policies. VP of individuals operations Eileen Naughton and an investigator on the corporate’s Cease Leaks workforce revealed that Google didn’t look into a number of high-profile leaks.
In August 2017, Google was grappling over an anti-diversity memo written by an worker that decried the corporate’s inclusivity initiatives. Posted to an inner messaging board, a replica of that doc ultimately leaked and was printed by Gizmodo.
In accordance with the depositions, Google didn’t examine the disclosure of the memo to the press. Nevertheless, Google did look right into a leak of worker particulars that led to doxxing and the cancellation of a company-wide Town Hall.
A more moderen incident concerned The Intercept studying about Project Dragonfly. Google’s plans on returning to China with a censored search engine and different merchandise had been detailed in-depth by the publication. This disclosure led to mass condemnation of Google from each workers and human rights teams. Because of the outcry, the corporate halted that project. In accordance with Naughton, no workers had been fired for leaking.
Equally, the corporate didn’t examine or terminate workers that leaked particulars about executive misconduct. A excessive profile New York Occasions report revealed how senior executives like Andy Rubin acquired giant sums on their exit regardless of claims of sexual misconduct.
In response to Wired’s report, Google argued that its coverage of investigating leaks has not modified. It cited a 40% enhance in investigations over the mishandling of confidential data in 2018 in comparison with the prior 12 months. Nevertheless, it’s not clear how high-profile these investigations had been versus the three instances talked about above that attracted mass highlight.